|
MGG Pillai Commentary Search
|
|
| Page 1 << Previous || Next >>
|
Found 126 matches for Chief Justice
| |
| 2006-04-09 | Are we slavishly following the West?
|
| 2006-02-28 | Can Pak Lah survive his son-in-law? PAK LAH IS IN DIFFUCULTIES because his son-in-law. Mr Khairy
Jamaluddin, does what he likes and any one who questions him can be
entangled in libel suits. Mr Husam Musa, a PAS MP, asked a few
questions, in an online PAS hewspaper, about his sudden wealth, and
ECM Libra has sued both. The company has decided that asking Mr
Khairy questions like Mr Husam's is a blight on it. But a defamation
suit can take years in the Malaysian courts, particularly if Mr Husam
and the PAS Publishing company defends it. The chances are good that
it will last after Pak Lah leaves office. Tan Sri Vincent Tan sued
me in 1993, I lost all the way to the federal court, but
another federal court bench decided the bench headed by the
then Chief Justice, who went to New Zealand on holiday with the
lawyer for Vincent Tan, was flawed. I am still waiting for the
federal court re-hearing. 12 years after i was sued. Mr Khairy could
be in the same boat as Tan Sri Vincent. But Pak Lah is already
saddled with the backlash over this.
|
| 2006-01-28 | Why is Tun Daim defending himself out of court? The Chief Justice, Tun Eusoff Chin, decided he would be part of the
three judges, while he was around, who heard permission to appeal.
In the Federal Court, Tun Eusoff sat. My lawyer asked that he be
recused, but he refused, saying there were not enough judges to go
around. This request was made after I had distributed photographs of
he and Tan Sri Vincent Tan's lawyer and their families holidaying in
New Zealand. But Tun Eusoff took the view that it did not matter as
there was no further appeal. So he thought. I lost again, but I
appealed to the Federal Court to reverse itself. But I could do it
only after Tun Eusoff retired. I filed the appeal, with a different
set of lawyers as Mr Karpal Singh felt the Federal Court would not
order what I wanted, shortly before Tun Eusoff was due to be sworn in
as governor of Penang. Since he was a party of a court action, he was
not appointed. The Federal Court in 2003 said it would rehear my
appeal. So far it has not.
|
| 2006-01-13 | Defamation and libel laws inhibit political debate in Malaysia Over the years, MPs were kept in the dark, and when they asked
questions, they were threatened with defamation suits. The National
Front got its favourite business men to silence the journalists. Tan
Sri Vincent Tan took me to court, and on a serious of moves which
showed that he gets the judges he wants, won all the way to the
federal court. By then he was out, the I was given a rehearing of the
Federal Court on the grounds that the Chief Justice had gone on a
holiday with the lawyer for Tan Sri Vincent Tan. This was followed by
Tan Sri Ting Pek Khiing of Ekran, who sued me in Miri and I have to
go there to file. Both are friends of the former prime minister, Tun
Mahathir Mohamed. Tan Sri Ting's case did not go any further after he
could not justitify his claim as events caught up with them, is now
out of the corporate scene, a diabetic in Singapore. Tan Sri Vincent
is ignored by the prime minister's friends now, and his flagship,
Berjaya Corporation, owes RM800 million, most to its subsidiary.
Defamation action will succeed, in Malaysia and Singapore, is it is
quickly settled. The National Kidney Foundation in Singapore sued any
one who said it was spending unnecessary money, but according to a
government-appointed firm of accounts, it seems it did. But the
National Kidney Foundation is in trouble, and the newspapers there go
to town, because the PAP wants to bring down a popular
politician.
|
| 2005-10-20 | People can be led like sheep, but not always
|
| 2005-06-22 | What is a tun worth? A scoop was what it thought it had. The newspaper was shortchanged
with the announcement of his Tunship. A television station linked to
the New Straits Times reported the event as "amongst those awared Tun
was the Chief Justice of Malaysia", thus evading having to mention
the other, Tun Ghazali Shafie. The RMP has its own reasons to
downgrade Tun Ghazali. The prime minister, Dato' Seri Abdullah Ahmad
Badawi, informed the RMP, at the spur of the moment, that he wanted
to visit an address in Wangsa Baiduri. A police detail arrived
minuites ahead wanting to find out whose house it was. Pak Lah
arrived, kept the police out, and remained with Tun Ghazali, who is
ill and in bed, in his bedroom, along for nearly an hour. The police
could not understand why this should be so, why Pak Lah did not take
the police into his confidence that they were kept aside. So his
driver's report of Tun Ghazali's problem with his secretary was used
by the RMP to destroy Tun Ghazali's credibility. And destroy it the
RMP did. It revealed the police report, which ought to have been
confidential, and the New Straits Times wrote of the incident as if
it were the gospel. There is only one problem with it: He did not
file a police report, all the questions he anwswered were police
questions on the report he did not file.
|
| 2004-09-14 | Riding the wounded tiger But since the government insists he should not have been acquitted,
and it believes the judges' obiter is correct, would it not fail in
its duties if it did not instruct the attorney-general's chambers to
charge him afresh for the same offence? After all, it wants the man
politically dead. This is its golden chance. And it has support from
the usual quarters. The former prime minister, Tun Mahathir Mohamed,
is convinced the federal court in wrong, and he is guilty as charged.
(This despite his twaddly belief that his successor, Dato' Seri
Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, engineered the acquittal to make him
irrelevent.) It was he who first accused him of corruption and
sodomy, sacked him from UMNO, where he was deputy president, and the
government, where he was deputy prime minister, had him charged and
convicted in a political conspiracy that now slowly reveals itself.
The attorney-general and Chief Justice of the day did his bidding to
convict him by playing fast and loose with the law and its procedure.
But all underestimated him. If any other member of the cabinet had
been damned, he would have stayed damned. Instead, as we know now,
all they did was to disturb a wounded tiger.
|
| 2004-09-10 | A strong Anwar makes UMNO weaker, not vice versa
|
| 2004-09-06 | Official and media confusion as Anwar leaves for surgery overseas TRY AS IT MIGHT, official Malaysia cannot rid its mind off Dato' Seri
Anwar Ibrahim. Extraordinary pressure was put on the two judges who
judged his conviction for sodomy could not stand in law: the Sultan
of Pahang called his relative, on of the two judges, to change his
mind; a senior police officer whose role was pivotal to convict Dato'
Seri Anwar turned up at the two judges' houses in the middle of the
night before but they showed him the door. The Chief Justice, half an
hour before the court sat, made a final attempt to throw his weight
so the man would be in jail until 2009. The judges stood their
ground. All officialdom could do was to grin and bear it, and let
the spin take over. This is proof the judiciary is independent. The
courts have spoken, and we will honour it (but that this was said is
proof it still struggles for its traditional independence). Make no
mistake, the judiciary is pure as the driven snow. The government
respects the judiciary.
|
| 2004-09-03 | Dato' Seri Anwar emerges into the spotlight, his reputation and instincts burnished
|
| 2004-09-02 | What the freeing of Anwar Ibrahim means to UMNO The common prisoner is not so common after all. He got what he wanted.
He outstared the BN government, lived long enough for its case to
collapse, and even the judges decided enough was enough. It does not
represent a new mood in the judiciary, which lost its independence
when its Chief Justice was drummed out of his own court, and those
who followed made certain it was a particularly pliable government
department. But with time this belief that Dato' Seri Anwar was
convicted by a kangaroo court damaged what little respect the
judiciary had. The prime minister, in one of his more regrettable
statements, wanted report cards from BN members of parliament to keep
them on their toes; the new Chief Justice, to prove his genuflection
to political authority, followed suit. But the judges had had enough.
They were becoming the laughing stock. And decided enough is enough
and opted to honour their oath of office.
|
| 2004-07-26 | The politics of Anwar Ibrahim's health
|
| 2004-07-12 | A murder in Hartamas confounds Pak Lah's commitment to law and order
|
| 2004-06-18 | Revoke the dato'ships and other awards from that master criminal, Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim!
|
| 2004-05-22 | Maid abuse and trial by hysteria Malaysia has long seized to believe in the sanctity of the law and of
justice. The Anwar Ibrahim trials and high profile cases where the
Chief Justice goes on holidays with the lawyer for a prominent
business man but would not recuse when requested topped the public's
contempt for justice in Malaysian courts. There are hundreds more. It
is reflected in peculiar ways. Malaysian corporations, when signing
contracts, insist on disputes adjudicated by foreign arbitration. The
system has broken down. The blame for that must be laid on the former
Prime Minister, Tun Mahathir Mohamed, who did not have a sense of
history, did not understand or care how the system worked, and cared
not if it broke down the system. All that mattered to him was this
his dictates were implicity obeyed. He did not understand government,
nor its workings, nor its history. It is system that provides
continuity. In any endeavour the individual should fit into the
system, not the other way around. If the system must be changed, an
alternative must be at hand. This is what the People's Action Party
did in Singapore. This is what Malaysia did not do. This is what the
United States did not in Iraq.
|
| 2004-03-10 | An armed forces chief, no less, can vote in the 2004 general election nine years after he died!
|
| 2004-03-08 | When a democracy is not a democracy
|
| 2004-02-15 | Has Pak Lah's anti-corruption drive gone awry?
|
| 2004-02-09 | Is Pak Lah's first 100 days in office any different from his predecessors?
|
| 2004-01-30 | The Anwar injustice, death and public flogging for rapists, and the judiciary's independence The Prime Minister, Dato' Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, had made it clear the judiciary is independent and pure as the driven snow. No one should question that. It does not matter that Dato' Seri Anwar is convicted to a larger political purpose which has nothing to do with what he is charged for, and he is where he is for that. It does not matter that he is arrested and humiliated according to a plan concocted by a cabal of the highest leaders in UMNO, which included the present prime minister and deputy prime minister. It does not matter that, as details surface, there was a plan to kill him shortly after his arrest but that was thwarted because of the presence of too many witnesses at his house, and his wife's insistence that she accompany him to the police station, and the subsequent karate chops on a blindfolded and manacled had a more sinister purpose. It does not matter that in his trials for corruption and sodomy, the judiciary was as eager as the prosecution to convict, whatever the rebuttal of the evidence presented. It does not matter that the Chief Justice did not respond to the mayhem at the Court of Appeal when he was denied bail. It does not matter it took six months to deny bail. It does not matter that it is now accepted as done that he would not be allowed bail.
|
<< Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Next >>
| |
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
This archive was created as a tribute to the late veteran
journalist MGG Pillai. We believed his writings are useful to develop a critical
thinking analysis.
By the way, the original mggpillai.com web site (2001-2006) was actually created
by one of us.
|
|