|
MGG Pillai Commentary Search
|
|
| Page 1 << Previous || Next >>
|
Found 352 matches for Pak Lah
| |
| 2006-04-20 | Globalisation, for Malaysia, means the foreigner will control what the local always did in the past THE WAR ON TERROR, as dictated by the United States, is fast becoming
one in Malaysia, as it already is in many countries with fealty to
Washington. This is adopted to keep the opposition away from
politics, but all it has done is to keep it alive. In Indonesia, this
is more widespread than is reported in the news reports, that getting
prominence only when this affects the government or foreign countries
with an axe to grind, usually and not exclusively Australia. In the
process, President Susilo Bambang Yudhyono is seen against the war of
terror, the fine elements of which are Washington's, or Australia's
dictates. Malaysia has gone wholly with the United States on this,
because its largest opposition is Islamic, which it wants to say is
pro-war on terror, mainly to blame it Islamically, but gets caught in
a bind as the National Front's version of Islam – now Islam Hadhari,
but that is under the present prime minister, Pak Lah, only; it was
not under the former leader – does not cut much ice in the
villages.
|
| 2006-04-14 | The crooked bridge and cultural enmity WHY DID DATO' SERI SYED HAMID, the foreign minister, and others in the
cabinet, make a fool of themselves days before the Prime Minister,
Pak Lah, said the crooked bridge to replace part of the causeway with
Singapore would not be built? Why had they not been penalised for
making the Malaysian government look stupid? What was the basis for
Pak Lah making his decision? Was it because his son-in-law, Mr Khairy
Jamaluddin, is reported to be close to Singapore and many believe is
its representative here? Why did Pak Lah defy his cabinet ministers?
He cannot say he is boss, and can do what he likes. He was a member
of the Mahathir cabinet which approved the bridge. Much money has
been spent in preparing for it. Just because Singapore says the
crooked bridge is unworkable? The public reasons for the crooked
bridge is as obscure as against it.
|
| 2006-04-13 | The National Front has no hope if it cannot retain the support of the middle class In Malaysia, a middle class man united the people against the
government. But the sacked deputy prime minister, Dato' Seri Anwar
Ibrahim, could not do it alone. The government, then led by Tun
Mahathir Mohamed, could not contain the demonstrations that resulted
and used force to break them up. But the middle class leaders went
back when Tun Mahathir resigned. UMNO under Pak Lah, who took over,
got the biggest majority ever in the general elections of 2004. Datuk
Seri Anwar and his men now is not sure he will see the support of
those days. But Pak Lah will make sure. His government withdrew the
30 sen petrol subsidy, and will withdraw other subsidies in the
coming years. The middle class is angry, more move against the
government, including members of UMNO and the National Front.
|
| 2006-04-12 | In Malaysia's Parliament, what a minister should wear is more important than the Ninth Malaysia Plan One man now threatening law suits got to be extremely rich because he
is close to the present Prime Minister, Pak Lah. He is worth about a
billion dollars, still in his thirties, has no job worth talking
about, unless getting a commission for selling government assets is
an occupation. When Pak Lah is no more Prime Minister, this man will
not be get any more money from the public purse. Each Prime Minister
has his cronies, who must make their money soon or lose out. To do
this, he must ignore the ground, and behave as if he is to the manor
born. For every man who behaves thus under the present prime
minister, I can show you dozens who once were but are now forgotten,
not doing well, or bankrupt. It is bad for the prime minister at this
time because the people on the ground rebel at policies and laws made
in their name but which excuses the coterie.
|
| 2006-04-12 | Ninth Malaysia Plan: Not what it is made out to be The only beneficiaries are those who get the contracts, those close to
the centres of power, and those close to Prime Minister Abdullah
Ahmad Badawi (Pak Lah). So any discussion of it which ignores the
facts misses the point.
|
| 2006-04-08 | Can the Ninth Malaysia Plan succeed if it is for a few? The Prime Minister, Pak Lah, has warned the people to stop complaining
about the Ninth Malaysia Plan. He is not used to government plans
being criticised, so his tetchiness is understandable. But it shows
the Plan is not to improve the lot of the people in whose name it is
announced, but of those who carry it out. This is, of course, not
mentioned. But Malaysia Today has on its website who will benefit:
the contractors, Chinese naturally, and not the people of Sarawak and
Sabah. That happens in West Malaysia too. The withdrawal of the 30
sen subsidy on petrol is so that one man could get all the contracts
in one section of the Ninth Malaysia Plan. Only RM160 billion was
earmarked for that section. But this man had RM200 billion worth of
projects. The withdrawal of the subsidy meant that this section could
have the RM4 billion a year. He could get all the contacts. Those on
the ground believe this, strengthened by reports on the Internet and
websites and the government's refusal to deny it.
|
| 2006-04-01 | How to be rich and successful, force others to believe that or make them bankrupt Few in Malaysia would miss a chance to be in the good books of the
politically powerful. Especially if it means they could be wealthy in
the bargain. But they will almost lose their magic when a new prime
minister takes over. It does not matter to them that others who
followed this route in the past are forgotten now. They do not
realise, or their spin meisters forget to tell them, they should
complete their legal actions when their patron is prime minister. If
I were to say today that Tan Sri Vincent is powerful under Pak Lah, I
would be laughed at. And rightly so. The legal action Tan Sri Vincent
brought against me still awaits a hearing in the Federal Court 12
years later, contrary to what he and his lawyer said then. But the
case is stuck in the Federal Court , certainly longer than it has
taken to issue the writ by stealth to the Court of Appeal decision.
Tan Sri Ting Pek Khiing did not proceed with his action in Miri in
Sarawak after the initial steps, perverting justice in the process,
and putting me to unnecessary and great expense. He is now in
Kuching, ill and cannot move about though he makes his appearance
daily at his new business venture. He is forgotten in Malaysia, his
Ekran Bhd, which once was traded at more than 100 ringgit, is now
a penny stock, as Tan Sri Vincent's Berjaya stock,
which followed Ekran's route, is. It would be a foolhardy investor
who bought either share on the stock market as investment.
|
| 2006-03-29 | Is the National Front for the people? Much of the public anger at government services has this type, among
others, of modernization to blame. To put it another way, the GLCs
and government departments work to annoy the public, already burdered
with government measures taken so that those close can benefit from
the public loss. The withdrawal of the 30 sen subsidy on the price of
petrol has brought this out in the open. This anger at being led up
the garden path is one reason why rise in petrol has become so
serious. Until the truth is told, and why, if it does, it took so
long to reveal it, Pak Lah must say categorically and truthfully that
it is not so that one relative can get all the projects in one
section of the Ninth Malaysia Plan. The withdrawal gave that much
extra for this man to get all the contracts in the section he was
aiming for. This may or may not be true, but it is widely believed.
It is not for the government or Pak Lah to say this is not so. No one
believes its denial, especially how it is said.
|
| 2006-03-13 | Pak Lah blinks as the people get angry Pak Lah SAID the people are angry with the 30-cent increase in petrol
but warned the opposition parties were taking advantage of it. He
withdrew the subsidy to petrol companies, a practice started about 40
years ago to keep prices down. The oil companies had not increased
the prices, but with the removal of the subsidy increased the price.
The government explained that petrol companies have not increased
the prices for some time but the government has withdrawn 30 cents of
the subsidies! Whatever the reason, the people now pay nearly two
dollars per litre in petrol. but It was not he who withdrew the
subsidy but his son-in-law, Mr Khairy Jamaluddin, so that the
government would have enough money for his projects under the 9th
Malaysia Plan. This may or may not be true, but the studied silence
in the government and civil service to allegations on the Internet
and alternate press that now takes as read that the son-in-law
demanded it. That sticks, whether Pak Lah likes it or not and he
refuses to say otherwise.
|
| 2006-03-04 | Can Pak Lah be prime minister when UMNO elections are held next year? DATUK SERI ABDULLAH AHMAD Badawi – formally but known to all and
sundry, even himself, as Pak Lah – is trapped. There are many
reasons why: his son-in-law, the deputy prime minister, Tun Mahathir
Mohamed, his office, UMNO headquarters, the non-Malay and non-Islamic
parties in the ruling National Front, Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim, his
political enemies. The withdrawal of RM4.4 billion annually, because
his son-in-law wanted RM20 billion for his projects, led to Pak Lah
being trapped. Mr Khairy Jamaluddin proposed to meet a RM20 billion
shortfall in the 9th Malaysia Plan by raising the petrol price. He
had earlier proposed RM200 billion worth of projects, RM20 billion
less than the plan. Pak Lah dutifully told Malaysians the government
could not afford the fuel subsidies. It was a spin. But how does Mr
Khairy, known in some quarters as 'Satan's son', sit in on official
committees, when he has no right to and is not in the government.
make proposals he cannot and should not? Pak Lah has trapped himself
because he allows his son-in-law to interfere in the administration
of government.
|
| 2006-03-02 | The rise in petrol price damages the National Front THE GOVERNMENT WILL SAVE RM4.4 billion annually by raising petrol
prices but it will cost Malaysians five times that. This saving will be spent on
public transport, says Pak Lah. So we must be happy the petrol prices are up! In
1990, it was RM1.10 a litre, today it is RM1.92. This is said to be inevitable, but
is it? Its explanation why this is necessary comes after the public rebelled.
Will the Malaysian government tell us, as rumours put it, why we are
selling oil to Taiwan at about RM20 till 2010. Again as rumours,
which turn out to be true most of the time, tell it, Malaysia is
paying Taiwan US$40 a barrel for all the oil we do not sell or use.
Most of that oil is now left in the ground, but we pay nevertheless.
I was told this cannot be true: "If what you say is true, this is an
unequal contract, and will be set aside." This rumour may be false,
but before it gets wider publicity, the government must come clean
about it. But can there be an unequal contract when the sale is by a
willing buyer to a willing seller?
|
| 2006-02-28 | Can Pak Lah survive his son-in-law? Pak Lah IS IN DIFFUCULTIES because his son-in-law. Mr Khairy
Jamaluddin, does what he likes and any one who questions him can be
entangled in libel suits. Mr Husam Musa, a PAS MP, asked a few
questions, in an online PAS hewspaper, about his sudden wealth, and
ECM Libra has sued both. The company has decided that asking Mr
Khairy questions like Mr Husam's is a blight on it. But a defamation
suit can take years in the Malaysian courts, particularly if Mr Husam
and the PAS Publishing company defends it. The chances are good that
it will last after Pak Lah leaves office. Tan Sri Vincent Tan sued
me in 1993, I lost all the way to the federal court, but
another federal court bench decided the bench headed by the
then chief justice, who went to New Zealand on holiday with the
lawyer for Vincent Tan, was flawed. I am still waiting for the
federal court re-hearing. 12 years after i was sued. Mr Khairy could
be in the same boat as Tan Sri Vincent. But Pak Lah is already
saddled with the backlash over this.
|
| 2006-02-26 | Pak Lah in a spot THE PRIME MINISTER HAS excused New Straits Times but not the Sarawak
Tribune and the Guong Ming Daily News. NST's front page apology on
the front page showed the paper was contrite, said the Prime
Minister. No body is penalised, as has happened in the two newpapers
although they did apologize. All the television stations have carried
cartoons deemed offending the Prophet, but how can they be punished?
The information minister, Mr Zainuddin Maidin, who is himself a
former newspaper editor, who has been running a feud with the former
editor-in-chief of the NST group, Mr Khalimullah Hassan, is caught
with a dilemma over the television stations under his control. TV3 is
run by acolytes of Pak Lah's son-in-law. NTV7 is not in the charmed
circle, so will escape if the other television stations are not
punished. But they carried the cartoons too. On that will depend on
the National Front government's credibility.
|
| 2006-02-24 | Crisis in journalism The New Straits Times has spawned The Malay Mail, Berita Harian,
Harian Metro, among others. Every editor of the group is selected for
his UMNO, not National Front, reliability. In recent years, the Prime
Minister selects or okays the name. To make it easier to control, one
of his close aides or man he trusts is made editor-in-chief. Tun
Mahathir, when prime minister, had appointed latterly Dato' Abdullah
Ahmad, a former MP from Kok Lanas, a former deputy minister and
political secretary to the second Prime Minister Tun Abdul Razak. Pak Lah appointed Dato' Kalimullah Hassan, and after he left, Dato'
Hishamuddin Aun. Dato' Kalimullah promised the NST that no action
would follow the publication of the cartoon, even if opposition
parties, including PAS, NGOs and others have lodged a police
report.
|
| 2006-02-21 | Pak Lah sheds crocodile tears over Proton Pak Lah SAYS PROTON needs a foreign partner after his government
prevented one to join hands with the carmaker. The adviser to Proton,
and the man who inisisted it be set up, Tun Mahathir Mohamed, was so
angry when the foreign partner, Volkswagen, withdrew from the link-up
that he returned the VW car that was given him. What is now known is
that deals behind to ensure that an private parties benefit rather
than the nation were hatched at that time, and Proton naturally was
the loser. Volkswagen withdrew from the deal, but why it did so is
not made public. The car company withdrew because a company just
formed by that efficient but corrupt minister, Datin Rafidah Aziz's
niece and nephew was given enough APs to allow Volkswagen to come
into Malaysia without Proton. Since the AP is Pak Lah's son-in-law's
cousin, Pak Lah cannot raise objections to the deal. Instead, he can
only say inanities about Proton needing a foreign partner.
|
| 2006-02-15 | Is the cabinet reshuffle for the country or the UMNO elections of 2007? Pak Lah has resuffled his cabinet, so the newspapers and spinmeisters
said. But has he? He has organised his cabinet to be ready for the
2007 UMNO elections, not to run the country effectively. He has
blinked at a time when he should not. He hopes the changes would
destroy lhis enemies. But he has ensured divisions in the cabinet,
between the cabinet and UMNO rank-and-file, UMNO against the people.
The other politicial parties in the National Front did not count, and
he dropped what their leaders did not want. His predecessor, Tun
Mahathir Mohamed, is not unhappy at the cabinet resuffle especially
since many of his supporters are in it. Those who had watched Pak Lah
announcing the cabinet on television would have seen a glum prime
minister ill at ease while his deputy, linked to Tun Mahathir,
grinning away. When Pak Lah dismissed the AP scandal as a minor
mistake and that did not justifiy sacking the minister, he gave the
impression that in running the country, those in politicial offfice
are expected to fill their pockets with ill-gotten money.
|
| 2006-01-27 | The National Front's ambivalence towards women The UMNO General Assembly had seriously argued banning those who left
UMNO from returning, aimed at preventing the former deputy president
and former Malaysian deputy prime minister, Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim
for returning to UMNO, but the resolution was hastily withdrawn when
it was discovered that three UMNO presidents, two alive, would have
been banned. The prime miniser, Pak Lah, when he was foreign
minister, had gone to Johore Bahru for the byelection in which Dato'
Shahrir Samad, now of the Backbenchers' Club, had stood as an
independent against the UMNO Baru candidate, and he was supported by
the old UMNO hands who disagreed with the new UMNO. Pak Lah had
joined the new UMNO crowd going to file nomination papers. He said he
did not know what to do when he met Dato' Shahrir Samad pushing the
Tengku in a wheelchair, and followed by thousands waving the UMNO
flag. The Tengku and Tun Hussein Onn remained loyal to the UMNO which
had been declared illegal, and refused to join the new entity. The
only difference between the two UMNO flags is that the insigna is
smaller on the new UMNO.
|
| 2006-01-27 | What you see is not what is He was an UMNO apparatchik when in office, and many in the party and
elsewhere, remember him as that. He would therefore have a rough ride
back. He is definitely not welcome in UMNO. He was talked of as a
potential president of PAS, but that is talk for the moment. He
speaks to them, to their leaders, he was invited to DAP's retreat
recently, he keeps his options open. That worries many in the
National Front and the opposition. But he is a politician with a
following of his own. When he moves, many of his personal followers
will move with him. That includes those who are with the other
parties, including the National Front. He is 58, of the same
generation as Pak Lah, eight years older and a distant relative. The
two are from Penang, and a political rivalry naturally exists. When
Pak Lah was foreign minister, one of his political moves in Penang
was to keep Dato' Seri Anwar out. That has not changed, although Mr
Khairy was squiring Anwar's daughter when he met, and later married,
Pak Lah's.
|
| 2006-01-23 | The racial divide in Malaysia is now a fact THE NON-MALAY CABINET MINISTERS who complained to their prime
minister, Pak Lah, about non-Muslim voices being unheard, is ordered
by Pak Lah himself to withdraw it and not let it be discussed by
outsiders, i.e. Malaysians. Why they took this extreme stand,
especially when they agreed with Pak Lah in the cabinet what they
protest now is easy to explain. The non-Malay ministers are beholden
to UMNO, and they nod their heads when the prime minister tells them
to. This time, their ground is in revolt. But most of them have
withdrawn their memo as the prime minister requested. One minister
even said he was surprised the press took great interest in the
memorandum. He of course chose to forget which were the media. But
among the two ministers who signed the memorandum is the MCA and MIC
presidents. The president of the two parties signed the agreement
which gave this country independence. Now they have to express their
dissatisfaction in a memo the the prime minister. It also revealed,
though not for the first time, that Pak Lah is prime minister not of
Malaysia but of the Malays. UMNO has decided, though that becomes
less and less decisive, that they will lead the Malays. But he looks
after the Malays only, and helps divide the country into racial
units.
|
| 2006-01-21 | Pak Lah has to get his team together THE PARLIAMENTARY SECRETARY TO the Health Ministry, Dato' S.
Sothinathan, was suspended for three months because he defied a
government decision. He had immunity when he complained, in
Parliament. But when ten non-Muslim cabinet ministers protested in
public what they had in the cabinet sessions agreed, probably because
they had to show their communities they meant well, there was
recriminations and explanations, but no action against them. Their
Malay ministerial colleagues, notably Dato' Nazri Aziz, in
criticising them, said they agreed with an Islamic state. But it
showed that the cabinet is split. The prime minister, Pak Lah, said
he was unhappy at the move, which was the first since independence.
But the more the ministers talked, the more it became clear that the
Malay and non-Malay ministers disagreed. In cabinet, these ten
ministers – why was another minister, Mr Kayveas, left out? – went
along with the proposal. But they had now to take the decision to
show they looked after their community's interest. But like the ten
ministers, Pak Lah makes confusing statements. National Front MPs
make it worse by saying the ten were off base, they did not know
Islam, and their protests must be ignored. So the National Front to
bring unity to this country brings disunity instead!
|
<< Previous | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next >>
| |
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
This archive was created as a tribute to the late veteran
journalist MGG Pillai. We believed his writings are useful to develop a critical
thinking analysis.
By the way, the original mggpillai.com web site (2001-2006) was actually created
by one of us.
|
|