IWK Sends Goons To Collect Debt It Cannot Prove
2001-07-17
The IWK general manager (communications), Mr Ishak Nengah, warns
"customers" that they must ensure that the strong armed debt
collectors IWK sends out are their goons, and not some free
lance. It is right, he says, for "customers" to fear that they
may not be genuine. "Customers have the right to ask for the
letter and if it is signed by [IWK general manager (customer
relations)] N. Jothesvaran," he says. Mr Jothesvaran's signature
is, you understand, so well known that every housewife knows
whether the scribble on the authorisation letter is his or not!
But when IWK sends out debt collectors, the onus is on it to
prove that in law a debt exists and which it could not collect
despite several attempts. This it cannot. It does not send
bills. I received three, in three different names, a few years
ago, and none since. Why? When it does not send bills or
collect its dues, sending debt collectors is unacceptable
harassment. A "customer" can sue it for harassment and other
legal remedies. As any first year law student would tell you,
for a contract to be valid there must be an offer and an
acceptance. In the majority of IWK "customers" there is no
acceptance, and therefore no contract.
Without a written contract, in other words, there is nothing
IWK can do. I would demand, if its goons turn up at my house,
for a contract I signed with IWK before I would pay. I would not
care about telephoning IWK or searching their website. I owe
them nothing, so why should I check with its website? I would
call the police and my lawyer instead. IWK breaks the law when
it sends debt collector goons to frighten its "customers" at
their homes into paying money IWK deems the "customers" owe, but
cannot prove the debt.
IWK is in its present predicament when sewage works were
taken over from the municipalities and handed over on a silver
plate to that international business man of unquestioned repute,
one Tan Sri Dato' Seri Vincent Tan. He messed it up, and it
changed hands a few times before it landed in the domain of the
Ministry of Finance Incorporated. But its bully tactics have not
changed. IWK works on the basis that customers owe it money
because it has taken over municipal functions from the
municipalities, and by taking over the functions, it has
municipal powers. It does not, pure and simple.
M.G.G. Pillai
pillai@mgg.pc.my
| |
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
This archive was created as a tribute to the late veteran
journalist MGG Pillai. We believed his writings are useful to develop a critical
thinking analysis.
By the way, the original mggpillai.com web site (2001-2006) was actually created
by one of us.
|
|