Much ado about nothing, the BN way
2003-07-12
THE SOPHISTRY WITH WHICH the National Front (BN) spins its web is
astounding. It rewrites its rules and plans whenever it hits a
snag or block, without consultation or debate. It stands for
elections, on behalf of its members, holds court in state
assemblies and parliament, in state and federal governments, in
which party affiliations disappear. In practice, this is not so.
UMNO dominates it, but UMNO, MCA, MIC and its members do not
stand for election. They stand on the BN banner. But in the BN
scheme of things, the BN is only useful at general elections. At
all other times, it is the individual political parties which
decide. The BN is ignored at all times. Its secretary-general is
an UMNO politician whose sell by date is lost in the mists of
time. It has no role but to rubber stamp whatever UMNO decides.
UMNO, you will recall, is a political party which has the
interests of the people. So it does not take decisions within the
narrow Malay interest. So it orders the BN to announce the
policies. While what UMNO wants, UMNO gets.
Individual parties do what they like. Whether they get away
with it depends on whether UMNO is weak or not. UMNO is now week.
UMNO is now weak. Its president, Dato' Seri Mahathir Mohamed,
steps down on 31 October 2003, and intends to hold office until
the last possible minute, on the stroke of midnight on that day.
His successor, Dato' Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, is on notice
that if he behaves as Prime Minister before his time, he could
yet be a deputy prime minister who never made it. When Dr
Mahathir should now be counting the days before his retirement,
and let Pak Lah take over in all but name, he shows he has no
such intention. He is now frightened of the prospect of UMNO
losing its marbles when he leaves. A crazy group of his cronies
believe he must be allowed to remain in office, mainly because
they feel, quite rightly, the gravy train will stop when he
leaves.
So when the BN should have lifted the suspension of the two
MCA state assemblymen, it was the MCA Presidential Council which
did. It caught BN and UMNO leaders off guard. The UMNO president
said nothing. The deputy president, in Tokyo on an official visit
as Malaysian deputy prime minister, is caught offguard. He told
reporters the MCA should inform BN, and hoped it had discussed it
with the Penang BN chief and state chief minister, Tan Sri Koh
Tsu Koon. He put a brave front: he had no objection "as the
lifting of the suspension is for the good of all". What he said
nothing, and one hopes he is not as weak as he displays.
The two BN state assemblymen, both from MCA with one who
defected from Gerakan, were suspended seven months ago when they
abstained on an Opposition DAP motion against the RM1.2 billion
Penang Outer Ring Road (PORR) scheme, as usual an ill-thought out
BN scheme to alleviate Penang's massive road transport problems,
caused by an earlier ill-thought plan. The only beneficiaries in
this waste of public funds is the BN politician, usually from
UMNO, and some individual parties in BN. There is now another
crazy attempt to build a second road link, this time underwater,
to link the mainland with Penang.
Understandably, there is much public disquiet. The two state
assemblymen abstained. What angered the BN was this was an
orchestrated revolt by the MCA to force the BN to return the
chief ministership of Penang it lost in 1969 back to it. The then
MCA president, Dr Ling, thought he could. It backfired. He did
not understand that there is more to political strength than the
Prime Minister's support. He disturbed the hornet's nest. In the
BN code of listening to the people, this is heresy and treachery.
If Torquemada was a Malaysian, lived in the 20th century, and the
BN disciplinary board chairman, he would have deviced a special
form of torture for the pair. He is not. Pak Lah is. He suspended
the pair from the party, removed privileges and perks BN elected
representatives have with others do not, were confined to limbo
and could not look after their constituents. When the interests
of the BN and the people collide, BN elected officials are
required to desert the people.
But with general elections approaching, this suspension
could not last. Instead of discussing this with the BN and doing
it the proper way, the MCA Presidential Council decided on a
frolic of its own: it lifted the suspension, taking everyone by
surprise. It is an open secret Pak Lah and the MCA President,
Dato' Seri Ong Ka Ting have serious differences between them.
Dato' Seri Ong believes he can force the pace because UMNO is
weak, Pak Lah so weak that he cannot oppose his dictates for the
damage that could cause BN. It is dangerous to assume that. Pak
Lah is tested. He must act firmly. One view is that Dato' Seri
Ong behaves so because he, like his predecessor, believes Dr
Mahathir is with him. That could well be. But what use is that
support on 01 November 2003?
In short, Dato' Seri Ong was wrong to force the ante. He
should have gone through the motions of BN support for what he
did. For what he did annoys the ground. He ensured the Ling
factions held on to power by ignoring the Lim faction. He calls
for unity when his actions belie his disinterest. He warned the
MCA Youth leader, Dato' Ong Tee Keat, and gave him a last chance.
Dato' Ong insists he stands by what he said. What is Dato' Seri
Ong going to do? Suspend him? Expel him? Ignore him? It does not
matter what he did, even if he choses to ignore the defiance, he
is cornered. With Pak Lah angry, the MCA ground in turmoil, his
highminded hopes for the community mere rhetoric, the ground
moving away, his stewardship of the MCA flounders. In one stroke,
he threw Pak Lah on the mat, showed the BN to be a toothless
coalition, showed the MCA split is unresolved. He lays the
quagmire for for Pak Lah to sink. Could he get away with this?
Not, if Pak Lah makes it clear, in action and words, that those
who undermine the BN would be out. Would he? Could he? Dare he?
On that hangs the future of not just the BN but all its members.
M.G.G. Pillai
pillai@mgg.pc.my
| |
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
This archive was created as a tribute to the late veteran
journalist MGG Pillai. We believed his writings are useful to develop a critical
thinking analysis.
By the way, the original mggpillai.com web site (2001-2006) was actually created
by one of us.
|
|