The EC chief admits he and his officers played fast and loose with the rules to short-circuit the polls
2004-04-14
THE ELECTION COMMISSION CHAIRMAN, Tan Sri Abdul Rashid Abdul Rahman,
is up the creek for what happened in last month's general election.
He was the EC secretary for nearly two decades, his longevity in that
office only added proof that he did his part to ensure that the EC
exists to return the National Front (BN) into power, election after
election. He did that with stellar diligence. In 1994, when the Party
Bersatu Sabah of Dato' Joseph Pairin Kitingan won that election, he
delayed the results long enough so the pro-Kuala Lumpur parties could
be sworn in and obtain a majority with the six nominated assemblymen. The
PBS team had squatted outside the residence of the Yang Dipertua
Negara (Governor) for nearly two days, with portable toilets in tow.
That is one of his prouder achievements. He did his job well. So he
was made EC chairman. The EC secretary, Dato' Wan Ahmad Wan Omar, is
a man steeped in political skullduggery: as a senior member in
Malaysia's intelligence services, he was now given a chance to show
his skill in public where in the past it was in private and often
secret. He went overboard. The detritus of his handiwork became so
obvious that the results the EC posted on its website was quickly
withdrawn, what it posted damaged it.
This belief that Malaysia's 11th general election was
shortchanged did not come from just hearsay. It was there on the EC
website for all to see. They were downloaded, and when it raised more
questions than answers, it was hastily pulled out. Why? In the Kuala
Trengganu parliamentary constituency, the EC website initially showed
an unaccounted 10,000 ballot papers. When it was challenged, it was
hastily pulled down, and the revised results showed nothing that
like. Tan Sri Abdul Rashid now claims that a third of the 200,000
postal ballot papers were not returned, and that accounted for "some"
constituencies showing a relatively high number of unreturned ballot
papers. The results have since been adjusted - there is no other word
to describe it - but few, except in the BN, accept it. When this
should have been the new prime minister, Dato' Seri Abdullah Ahmad
Badawi's greatest triumph, his strength is now dissipated in this
deliberate attempt to turn the election wholly towards BN. The
Barisan Alternatif (the Alternate Front), today (14 April 2004)
released its analysis of the poll results, based on official
documents. Not that it would improve matters much. The EC has
decided that for all its faults, it did right, and if the Opposition parties
did not agree, the redress is in the courts.
But the EC's case is flawed. Tan Sri Abdul Rashid, in earlier
press statements, after the polls, thought the flaws and mishaps
serious enough to demand a royal commission to look into it. But
there would be no royal commission: the BN president, Pak Lah, has
decided against it. It proves, if nothing else, that he is answerable
not to the King who appoints him, but to the man he takes orders from.
When the EC chairman himself is in doubt about the poll results to
demand a royal commission, no amount of whitewash can whiten the EC's
dark deeds. Now he comes up with more. He blames the national
printer, PNMB's proof readers for the mistake in the Sungei Lembing
state constituency in Pahang for substituting the PAS symbol against
the KeADILan candidate. Then he admits the EC officials, in Pahang,
and the polling stations, ignored EC directives to check and
countercheck all ballot papers. He has his reasons why they did not,
but they do not count: they had a constitutional duty, and they breached
it. They should no be asked to explain why.
He does not explain why polling in Selangor was extended
unilaterally by two hours, an act which took even the candidates in
Selangor by surprise. He does not explain why the electoral register
given to Opposition candidates was gazetted on 02 March 2004, while
the register used in the polling was gazetted on 15 March, two days
after nomination day. EC officials were at pains to insist that the
register available on 13 March would be used for the polls. Why was
there this rush to get the latest register for the polls? This
confusion led to growing doubts amongst concerned Malaysians that the
EC deliberately went about to make the Opposition fall flat on its
face, not on its own, as they probably would have, but with the EC's
active support. If this comes to the court, as it must, Tan Sri
Rashid and Dato' Wan Ahmad has much to answer for. Tan Sri Rashid
must explain why Dato' Wan Ahmad did an internal probe at such short
notice, without any basis, and without interviewing those who
claimed they had been shortchanged.
He missed out one department who made it easy for phantoms to
vote: the National Registratioin Department, which issues identity
cards. Hundreds of thousands of identity cards are issued, legally,
by the NRD, before general elections. Tens of thousands of illegal
immigrants suddenly were given the "blue" identity cards, which citizens
hold, and registered as voters.
Because its work is behind the scenes, the NRD's role is not
addressed or known. The Opposition parties are wrong to insist that the ICs
given the illegal immigrants and others are fakes: they are not, they
are the real thing. Tan Sri Rashid, when EC secretary, worked with
the NRD in Sabah to ensure the PBS government was defeated, giving
tens of thousands of illegal immigrants and refugees the ICs, so they
could vote.
A royal commission would bring these, and other inconvenient
facts, to public notice. The last thing the BN government wants is
another scandal of such dramatic proportions that could sink it. Even
with a 90 per cent majority in parliament. It is in every one's interest in the
government to hope this matter would fade away. It would not. Tan
Sri Rashid contradicts himself every time he opens his mouth, and he
has revealed more than he should, that he and the EC has much
explaining to do. No doubt he and the EC secretary would be
subpoenaed when the election petitions are filed. In one sense, what
happened with the elections is hubris, the arrogance that it can do
what it likes, so long as the BN is behind it, the opposition could
do nothing no matter what. But I am afraid the EC crossed the
Rubicon. There is no turning back. I doubt if the BN has understood
the magnitude of what it wrought.
M.G.G. Pillai
pillai@streamyx.com
| |
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
This archive was created as a tribute to the late veteran
journalist MGG Pillai. We believed his writings are useful to develop a critical
thinking analysis.
By the way, the original mggpillai.com web site (2001-2006) was actually created
by one of us.
|
|