Two traitors at the UMNO general assembly: Anwar Ibrahim and money politics
2004-09-26
BOTH WERE ABSENT AT the just concluded UMNO general assembly – one
never wanted to, the other dare not – but in the "best" debates heard
in years, as the youth chief, Dato' Hishamuddin Hussein would have us
believe, only Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim and money politics mattered.
They are irrelevant in UMNO, but they had to be excorsised, drawn and
quartered for the damage they can and do cause. The UMNO president
lead the charge; every sycophantic leader raised it to a war cry. But
the twin traitors of UMNO lodge deeply, in fear, loathing or
indifference, in the heart of every delegate. In public, they are
excoriated; in private welcomed as a long lost sibling. The
mainstream media has made it their role to explain to Malaysia that
both are a pernicious influence not only on UMNO but on every
citizen, Malay and non-Malay, in this blessed land. In the process,
much got lost in three days of debate and elections. In a nutshell,
UMNO lost its way. But it does not know it yet.
No speaker missed a chance to rail against Dato' Seri Anwar and money
politics. One would have thought that both united to bring UMNO to
its knees, the leaders blabbering like idiots when either or both are
mentioned. How do we know there is no money politics in UMNO? Every
winner in the party elections proclaimed loudly and clearly that they
did not know what this money politics is, did not indulge in it, and
won because the members decided they should. Those who failed should
try harder to be the servants of the people the winners are. They
lost because they did not serve the people. It did not matter of
course that on the eve of the election, many candidates happily doled
out money to help the expenses of those who came to vote. That is not
corruption or money politics, you undersand, but just what a
politician would do so others would not be put to money problems for
coming afar to vote. The UMNO president, Dato' Seri Abdullah Ahmad
Badawi, said he did not believe this talk of bribery, vote buying and
money politics. It is spread, did you not know, by anti-UMNO elements
out to destroy UMNO and Malay unity.
How else could one explain why Pak Lah is the major loser in this
general assembly. His slate is overshadowed by that of his deputy,
Dato' Seri Najib Tun Razak, and others. Pak Lah promised that if
indeed there was money politics, he would leave no stone unturned to
sack those elected found to have indulged. Just send him the
evidence, he would do the rest, he promised. At the same time, he
insisted there is no evidence yet. In fact, with an eye to the
future, UMNO would define money politics. It is vague now. In future,
UMNO members would know how to steer clear of money politics, and
save their souls. To define money politics should not be difficult.
The other traitor is defined. All UMNO needs is adapt this to money
politics. What could be simpler? This would allow UMNO leaders to
speak loudly and clearly about the twin traitors ad nauseum, get the
members to know who looks after their interests long after the tumult
and shouting of the general assembly.
The elections, with its upsets and political realignment, turned the
general assembly into an irrelevant sideshow. Those who lost, and
their supporters, ignored the proceedings. The high profile losers
continued to insist they would continue to serve UMNO. In this
realignment, the new winners pledged absolute fealty to Pak Lah,
while sharpening their knives for the confrontations to come; Pak Lah
made a feeble attempt to mask his petulance, by insisting that those
who by deceit would be forced out, though that would mean nothing if
he does not carry out his threat. But there is as yet no clear
indication how UMNO would reform itself to make it relevant to the
Malay community of tomorrow, if it would take the fateful step of
reining in the the mentris besar, whose power is at its highest in
the councils of UMNO. The centrally ordered unity is under threat,
with a quiet demand that the states want a say in the direction of
the country. It must worry UMNO that power now seeps from the centre
to the states. This became pronounced when Kuala Lumpur denied
Trengganu its petroleum royalties. It was to hold a PAS state
government to ransom, but its unintended consequence was in the
UMNO-controlled states, which wondered if it would happen to them if
they had differences with the centre. The rising power of the mentris
besar in the UMNO supreme council is one consequence of this.
When two brilliantly elusive traitors spent their waking hours to
destroy an institution its its 58th year of existence, how else could
it be otherwise? If the traitors are not reined in, God Forbid, they
would go and infect the Opposition. UMNO could not have that, could
it? The Opposition could well be the stronger because of it, and the
election system could descend to that in the Philippines, where every
political party has equal chances to cheat to win the elections. So,
other important issues got short shrift. Malay unity, Malay rights,
bumiputra privileges, how they interact with the non-Malays upset at
this continued mollycodding of the Malay and bumiputra communities,
and what this means to the Malaysian polity and community were
discussed almost as an aside to the main discussion on the twin
traitors.
There was no discussion on these issues, only a series of edicts, and
the promise that that while the Malay and bumiputra would dominate in
every sphere of Malaysian life, it is the non-Malay who would
benefit. Islam Hadhari was also discussed: it is not a sect; it
receives foreign attention, with several asking about it. But only
one man seemed to know what it is: Pak Lah. Somehow it fell flat
amongst the delegates. One delegate called it, in private, Islam
Terlari (Islam Derailed). But then this happens when an idea is
forced upon the public with scant understanding of what it is. Even
UMNO members are in the dark about it, but they are told it is for
their own good. To put it in a nutshell, the twin traitors derailed
this year's UMNO general assembly, with or without Islam
Hardhari.
M.G.G. Pillai
pillai@streamyx.com
| |
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
This archive was created as a tribute to the late veteran
journalist MGG Pillai. We believed his writings are useful to develop a critical
thinking analysis.
By the way, the original mggpillai.com web site (2001-2006) was actually created
by one of us.
|
|