Are the Indonesian Muslims responsible for the Bali bombings?
2005-10-03
TUN MAHATHIR GOT IT RIGHT. He did not apportion blame on the Bali
bombings to Al Queda or the Jemayah Islamiyah or to other Muslim
groups. But the ease with which both these organisations were
blamed, and that this has been on the news particularly round-the-
clock ever since the bombings last week, and the defensive posture of
the Indonesian government followed by the British blaming the
Australians for not letting it know of its 'early warning' to
Australian revellers in Bali, and the constant berating of those who
would listen that Al-Qaeda was involved, suggests something has gone
wrong. The Western governments, or its intelligence agencies, are
behind it, and keep at it because the people on the ground in
Indonesia and elsewhere do not believe the events in Bali last week.
The United States (and Australia, among others) created incidents in
South Vietnam in the 1960s, blaming it on the Vietcong. There is no
unanimity among Western reporters that Al Qaeda was involved, Jason
Burke of the Guardian thought that Al Qaeda could not be involved,
and the discordant voices in the Western media is matched by the
ordinary people around the world, Muslim or otherwise, having doubts
on the official story of the Bali bombing.
But it came at the right time. The Western nations led by the United
Nations are caught in a bind in Iraq, Iran was refusing to be
bamboozled by the Western powers over its nuclear plans, North Korea
has caught flatfooted the six-nations that negotiatied an end to the
nuclear controversy by insisting that the nuclear power plant it had
planned was for peaceful uses, and asked the United States to
continue to build it for it. But not after North Korea established
the point that the United States was 'playing' politics with it. The
people around the World, outside the West, cheered in their hearts
for what North Korea has achieved. It has now asked the UN and other
agencies to stop feeding its malnourish people, as it believes it is
part of the West's plan for North Korea.
The ordinary people in the Muslim world did not believe in the world
as dictated by the West, and it was affecting the West's relations
with Indonesia, particularly its leaders led by its president, Susilo
Bambang Yudhoyono. Australia has even offered its police and forensic
teams to assist the Indonesian police in solving the Bali bombings.
Or is it to ensure that the Indonesian police do not implicate it?
The West has gots its reading right, even if it killed a few
thousands of its citizens in a country it has long wanted to
destabilise. In the matter of real politik, what does it matter if a
few thousand of its citizens are killed? After all, its citizens have
turned out to be its worst enemy. It can kill more of them and lay
the blame on Al Qeada or its fraternal organisation. That appears to
be what has happened in Bali, and the West is hoping that the people
will eventually accept it as the work of Osama bin Laden or his
fraternal cousins. It is not right, you understand, that the
governments in the West are accused of killing its own citizens. It
can killed Third World citizens with impunity, and keep no record of
it as in Iraq, while it maintains the fiction that its own citizens
are sacrosanct. Lyndie England is jailed for three years for abusing
prisoners at Abu Ghraib prison, while prisoners are kept in
Guantanano prison for years for being a Muslim and are denied rights
in a US court to challenge their illegal detention.
But it has got the Indonesian government on its side. President
Yudhoyono and others have parroted the West's official version that
the Al Qaeda or the Jemayah Islamiyah are involved in the Bali
bombing. But the people, even those who watch CNN or BBC assiduously,
do not believe it and begin to ask questions. President Yudhoyono as
joined President Musharaff and, let us not forget, Pak Lah in
Malaysia, are Muslim leaders in the forefront of anti-Muslim terror
and prepared to work with the West against its own people. I do not
agree with the current trend of turning people into Muslims, while
ignoring their racial backgrounds, but I can see why it is done: the
Muslims find comfort in a world religion, brought about by the events
of 9/11. It is a direct reaction to the West's crusade against the
Muslims. Today, Turkey will decide if it becomes a member of the
European Union. Its foreign minister will not go to Brussels for the
negotiations if it can only join the EU as a subsidiary state or as a
junior state that would allow its poor to work in the EU.
Supercilious talking heads have looked upon Turkey joining the EU as
a moderate Muslim ally. But several countries in the EU are against
Turkey being a member. But there are already Muslims in the EU, and
they would also be put on hold by the decision taken today.
The war in Iraq has brought Al Qaeda into the country, and all Muslim
fighters, most are from the ground, into the country. These people
do not read newspapers, listen to pontificating statements on
television or read 'think' pieces in the main newspapers in the
West. And they do not accept Islam to be what they say it should
be. In Arabia, Sunni Islam rules. In Iraq, it does not. The United
States invaded Iraq and disbanded the Sunni Muslim from their posts
in the government, allegedly for being a Baathist. But the Sunni
rule in Iraq was ensured by the British, in a race with France for
colonial hegomony in the Middle East. They ruled Iraq for 30 years,
and lost out when its Sunni prime minister, dressed in a woman's
dress, complete with the hijab, was flayed alive by the crowd in
Baghdad when he was caught out. The subsequent rulers were Sunni, of
which Saddam Hussein was the latest. In thumbing for Shia religious
rule, Britain was dismantling its own creation, and turned, with
American help, into a mess. Saddam Hussein was hated in the Middle
East, but the ineptitude of the West in Iraq has allowed Saddam to be
a Sunni martyr. He knows he will be hanged. But he will be hanged a
martyr in the Middle East. Meanwhile, Iraq has become an
ungovernable country, with the West, particularly the United States,
making mistakes that will prove Samuel Huntington's thesis of a clash
of civilisations,
The West, particularly the United States, is doing badly in Iraq.
The insurgents, mostly Sunni, are in the ascendancy, and the only
reports we receive are from reporters who are tied to the West and
report the West is winning. But it is not. The Katrina and Rita
hurricances in the United States, with reporting by CNN, showed how
maladjusted the US civil servant is, like the US is keen to say that
the Third World civil servant is after a tragedy. It turns out that
the Hollywood version of the United States, which we in the Third
World see, is not the United States that is. Those in power make
full use of it to make a suffering of the people. So what the West
does, with Hollywood and its journalists, is not what is. And those
in the Third World know it already. The West must go a step higher
and rope the people in the Third World, educated as he or she is,
in. But the bombing in Bali last week is clearly the way to do it.
M.G.G. Pillai
pillai@streamyx.com
| |
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
This archive was created as a tribute to the late veteran
journalist MGG Pillai. We believed his writings are useful to develop a critical
thinking analysis.
By the way, the original mggpillai.com web site (2001-2006) was actually created
by one of us.
|
|