The prostitutes of globalisation
2005-11-23
THERE AUSTRALIAN OUTCRY ON Singapore's anticipated hanging of an
Australian of Vietnamese origin is expected. There was a similar outcry
over Malaysia hanging two Australian Caucasians. There is no difference
in the outcry. The Australians have found reasons for the media that the
trials were unfair. But they make no such claim when Singaporeans,
Malaysians, Thailand, Vietnamese citizens are hanged. Their attitude
is they deserved it, and they were not 'our' citizens anyway. There
is much wrong in the way death sentences are handed out in these two
countries, and many have kept their date with the hangman innocent.
So what is special about Western and Australian citizens hanged in
Singapore and Malaysia? Nothing, only that these countries are the
prostitutes of globalisation and should know their place. They should
not upset on the West or Australia by hanging one of their
citizens. Malaysia defied that, during Tun Mahathir's term as prime
minister, by hanging two Australians and one Englishman. Singapore
makes an issue once in a while, jailed an Englishman for breaking
Singapore laws, sent an American home when he has sure of being
convicted under drug laws and hung. The Australians are not
interested if one of their citizens who is not Caucasian, and so he
will be hung. As he should be. No country, not even a prostitute of
globalisation, should be deterred against carrying out its laws. The
death sentences for carrying minute amounts of drugs was put into the
law books, in Singapore and Malaysia, at the West's insistence. It is
now a problem in these countries, given their unfairness, that death
sentences are carried out in secret, and the Malaysians know of it
usually only after the fact. It a political issue here so it is kept
hidden. In contrast, the Australian leaders are on the defensive that
one of its citizens, a model, found with banner drugs in Indonesia,
is in fact a Muslim.
Singapore, priggish at the best of times, now consider casinos, to
attract the foreigner. Elaborate rules are drawn to keep the
Singaporeans out. Singaporeans are warned not to enter these casinos
except under very stringent rules that favour the rich and the
powerful. Similar rules are in force in Malaysia, but there is a
special room in Genting Highlands casino, for instance, for Malaysian
cabinet ministers, sultans and Muslim highrollers - for whom, like
the Muslim poor, gambling is banned in Islam - and kept hidden from
the populace. But how many former and present cabinet ministers break
it every time they enter the casino in Genting Highlands? The
casinos, in Singapore and Malaysia, are for the foreigner, for whom
facilities are built to which its own citizens are banned. Singapore
is a rest-and-recreating centre for American troops who were then
fighting in Vietnam in the 1960s, and is today host to about 2,000
troops of the island. mainly as insurance against Malaysia attacking
the island republic. But both are kept on a tight leash by the West
and Caucasian countries. The governments in both keep the citizens in
the dark while its leaders take orders from the West, usually the
United States. Especially in the war on terror. The governments of
Singapore and Malaysia are with the United States, but most of the
people are not. To stay in power, they believe they must. They warn
of 'Muslim fundamentalists' on behalf of the United. And behave as
prostitutes do. They expect to remain in power for all times. But so
did Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden. And look where they are now!
In Malaysia, facilities are built not for its citizens but for
foreigners. Kuala Lumpur has become a poor example of a third rate
European of American citizen so that the foreigner will crow about
it. But it is neither, and the citizen is shortchanged. Singapore
looks after its citizens better, but does not allow them to have
their own mind. It treats its citizen like a pet dog, and does not
allow him to go beyond an artificial limit. The result is
predictable: it is monkey-see-monkey-do mentality at work. Executives
are highly paid but do not think 'out of the box' - as the current
Western trite phrase to describe what its leaders must do. Malaysian
executives working in Singapore talk of discussions which flounder
because the Singaporean executive believes in 'monkey-see-monkey-do'
scheme of thinking. This is a phase, and this phase will last as long
as modern Singapore paterfamilias, 83 year old Lee Kuan Yew, lives.
The island does well economically, but it does not allow thinking to
the contrary, and so the Singaporean is kept dark about the future.
But the new dawn is already at hand. Particular groups of
Singaporeans do not want to be part of the system, and bid their time
when they can play a meaningful role outside of the People's Action
Party. The laws are made to keep all except those from the People's
Action Party out. The opposition is allowed space to exist only if it
follows the PAP's guidelines. So the debates are artificial, just as
it is in Malaysia, but the opposition, not known even by the PAP or
UMNO in Malaysia, is active.
Singapore and Malaysia are two peas in a pod. They could not be
separate even if they wanted to. The two countries are at odds with
each other. They were once joined in Malaysia, but that experiment
was unhappy, and Malaysia expelled the island republic after two
unhappy years. Mr Lee Kuan Yew, then prime minister, did not want to
leave Malaysia. But Singapore is lauded in Malaysia by most people
for its laudable economic success. The Chinese in Malaysia sees
Singapore's economic success to prove his worth in Malaysia, and the
Malay in the republic bides his time while hoping he would be part of
Malaysia some time in the future. But this hopes are dashed even
before they are uttered. The Singaporean Chinese has contempt for the
laid back, comparatively, Malaysian Chinese, who looks upon his
Singapore compatriot as uncouth, uncivilised, and overbearing. The
Singaporean Malay views his Malaysian Malay compatriot as a Malay
backwoodsman. But eventually Singapore will be part of Malaysia.
Singapore cannot live without water, which it gets from Johore. There
is a campaign in Singapore about newater. It may or may not succeed.
But its water agreements with Johore ends in 2061. The tough
negotiations will begin then between a confident Malaysia and a
diffident Singapore. All the leaders in Malaysia and Singapore would
be dead and gone by that time. The new team will be forced to accede
to Malaysia, but I suspect as a component of Johore, not Malaysia as
it was between 1963 and 1965.
But both will be prostitutes of globalisationt, either as one or as
two. The globalisation is to ensure the Western nations' control of
the world. There is the downside, for which no serious consideration
is made. Globalisation, in other words, is another form of
colonialism. But globalisation has its naysayers. Osama bin Laden,
Al-Qaeda, Saddam Hussein and others like them do not agree with
globalisation as it is practiced now. Education has make people
think, and people around the world see globalisation as one in which
they could benefit. The United States is tearing its hair on jobs
lost because of it. But it was the United States that set the trend
of having its manufacturing facilities in the regions of the world
where manufacturing costs are cheap. IBM computers will soon be
Chinese. The nether regions of the world are becoming educated, and
see why they cannot benefit from globalisation in its stated form,
not as its prostitutes. They were manufacturing countries before
globalisation. China in the 21st century is Japan in the 20th. The
West is trying its best to stop it. But it cannot. China has forced
prices down. It had upset prices worldwide, by offering good products
at a cheaper price. Parker now has a manufacturing unit in China and
sells pens for RM25 that would have cost ten times more if China was
not a manufacturing country. The United States is worried that
globalisation would go away from its control, politically and
economically. But this problem is not with the prostitutes. They will
provide the services to whoever is dominant.
M.G.G. Pillai
pillai@streamyx.com
| |
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
This archive was created as a tribute to the late veteran
journalist MGG Pillai. We believed his writings are useful to develop a critical
thinking analysis.
By the way, the original mggpillai.com web site (2001-2006) was actually created
by one of us.
|
|