Was it UMNO vs PAS in Pengkalen Pasir, or Khairy Jamaluddin vs Dato' Seri Najib Tun Razak?
2005-12-08
THE NATIONAL FRONT, OR rather UMNO, has won the Kelantan state
constituency seat of Pengkalen Pasir. The National Front publicity
machine is ecstatic about it, but UMNO does not think it a victory.
They see it not as a gladitorial contest between UMNO and PAS but as
between Khairy Jamaluddin and Dato' Seri Najib Tun Razak to see who
would have the inside track to be Prime Minister after Khairy's
father-in-law, Dato' Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi. The 140-vote win is
neither here nor there. There were 160 votes spoilt, surprisingly the
same number as postal votes. This is dubbed in UMNO as "Khairy's
election". And Khairy Jamaluddin had set the tone: UMNO would get a
700 vote majority, and Dato' Ibrahim Ali, a former UMNO leader who
has been expelled and stood as an independent, would get less than
500 votes. Khairy Jamaluddin could only deliver the second of his
promises. Dato' Ibrahim Ali lost 1,100 votes less than he received in
2004. UMNO brought in 3,800 votes from elsewhere who were registered
to vote in the constituence. Pemuda UMNO and Puteri UMNO said they
were in control of the 2,000 new voters. UMNO should have got at
least 6,900 vote majority, nearly ten times more than it had
predicted, but got less than the postal votes. The efficient National
Front propaganda machine has called it a victory, nevertheless, and
the newspapers reported it as such and how the PAS state government
in Kelantan is dithering because of it.
It is on shaky ground when it asks PAS to resign from the state
government because it has now only a one-seat majority. In 1969, the
Alliance ruled Perak and Selangor with a one-seat majority for three
years, when the National Front was formed with opposition parties
like Gerakanan and the People's Progressive Party joined it, along
with several others including Parti Se-Islam Malaysia, now its sworn
enemy for the Malay mantle. After Dr Mahathir won the UMNO presidency
by 40 votes against Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah in 1987, he said he would
not resign with even with a one vote majority. Since the state
assembly meets only twice a year, the PAS state government in
Kelantan, sits tight and unless it amends the state constitution,
which needs a two-thirds majority, it is safe. The National Front,
which includes UMNO, can vote against the budget, but it would not
vote against any bill which pays them its allowance. It has voted the
budget every time PAS was in power. It was forced out in 1978 by a
force majeure organised by the National Front. The propaganda machine
is to get all people to vote against PAS, not look at the realities.
It is fair to ask the Alliance why it did not resign when it had only
a one-seat majority in Selangor and Perak in 1969, and why Tun
Mahathir said that he would remain if he won by one vote. That PAS
has ruled Kelantan for 37 years after the first general elections in
1959 put paid to the notion that it does not know how to rule.
In Pengkalen Pasir, the National Front used a cannon to kill a fly.
As one anaylist said: "The National Front is like someone who spend
RM10 million to by a RM300,000 link hourse. The only other buyer has
RM100,000. And the successful bidder is crowing to the rooftops that
he got the house." But did he, or to be more precise, did UMNO in
Pengkalen Pasir? Last night, Dato' Seri Najib's camp were celebrating
at the result, because National Front won by a narrow margin. They
would have been happier if UMNO had lost. All those unhappy at UMNO
winning in Pengkalen Pasir knew they supported one rejected by UMNO
ground. The Naional Front makes sure there is an army camp in each of
the leader's constituencies. And the soldiers vote in full view of
their officers seeing how they voted. There are two ways how this
could be done: one by watching the soldier or policeman vote, and the
officers vote for the National Front on behalf of the soldier. The
army camps are built in constituencies of UMNO leaders.
A 3,000 bonus vote goes to the leaders of the UMNO: Tun Mahathir,
when he was prime minister, Dato' Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, Dato'
Mustapha Mohamed, among others, have army camps in their
constituencies. But there are army commandants now who believe the
vote is secret, and it is none of their business to see how their men
voted. Dato' Mutapha lost Jeli parliamentary constituency because the
camp commandant insisted on the vote being free. In 1999, the
commandment of one camp thought so, and ordered his men to vote as
they saw fit. The postal votes are kept in a police station three
days before the election day. The camp commandant and the Keadilan
candiate was informed, by an anonymous call, that the votes had
disappeared. They rushed to the police station to confirm it. But the
missing 3,000 postal votes went to the National Front candidate, and
he became the MP for that constituency. The postal votes are
manipulated to keep the government in power in Kuala Lumpur. In state
constituencies like Pengkalen Pasir, the postal votes come from civil
servants and police stations. The postal votes for that
constituencies may have voted for PAS or split for the three
candidates. Until we are told how the postal votes were cast, we
would have to assume that the postal votes became spoilt votes.
The byelection has left UMNO with heavy commitments. It has
promised the people of Pengkalen Pasir to do things they have
forgotten in the state constituencies they have won in the 2004
general election. It would be business as usual from now on. A sleepy
hollow was turned into a metropolice for the duration of the
byelection, with UMNO's help, and it has become a sleepy hollow
again. UMNO was interested in making a point, see Khairy Jamaluddin
win handsomely, but PAS was interested in Pengkalen Pasir in the
larger intests of the Muslim ummah. Islam Hadhari, which UMNO throws
around the country as superior to Islam was kept in Kuala Lumpur
during the byelection. The last thing UMNO wanted was a theological
discussion on the benefits of Islam Hadhari and Islam. Malaysia would
see contests like in Pengkalen Pasir in the years to come, with the
National Front and lUMNO being more arrogant and the thinking its
plan is best because it has more money to spend. Some people will be
mollycoddled into accepting that propaganda, but many would not in
the coming years. When the Barisan candidate in Bricfields offered
RM10 each to any one who would vote for him, it was suggested he
should pay RM10 a month for five years to get the vote. He lost.
Propaganda and modern electoral methods might work for a while, but
not always. Pengkalen Pasir proved that.
M.G.G. Pillai
pillai@streamyx.com
| |
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
This archive was created as a tribute to the late veteran
journalist MGG Pillai. We believed his writings are useful to develop a critical
thinking analysis.
By the way, the original mggpillai.com web site (2001-2006) was actually created
by one of us.
|
|