The US caused the civil war in Iraq
2006-02-25
PRESIDENT BUSH WAS CROWING two years ago that Iraq is a democracy,
that it is a far better place that when Saddam Hussein, who is now
facing trial for his life, was in charge. But US destroyed the
framework, made enemies of the Baathist Party, opened the country to
be run by Shia, made sure that the Sunnis would never have a place in
the government. The civil war is fuelled by the Sunnis, Iraqi
nationalists (both Sunni and Shia), the youngsters who see no future in
an Iraq under American control. President Bush has had to eat every
one of US optimistic statements. Sure, there are foreigners amongst
these insurgents, but so has the Americans. The world hears only one
side of the story, the insurgents are not allowed, but the appears on
Arab television stations, even if they do not report the more
horrendous American atrocities, is had enough. In less than two
years, the Americans have made themselves unpopular not only in Iraq,
but elsewhere in the Middle East and Iran. But they want a foothold
in the Middle East at any cost. Would they get it?
More than 100 die everyday. It does not matter who killed them. The
Americans kill at leisure. The insurgents kill to frighten the
Americans, the Iraqis who have sided with them, to get the support of
the Iraqis. Others get killed, as they would in any situation like
Iraq is in now. And like the Americans, there are several groups
among the insurgents who do the killing.The Americans, with Britain
and a host of countries arm twisted to send troops, have spent
billions of dollars to bring the insurgents to heel. But they have
begun to fight with the government they established. The latest
American weapons have been tested in Iraq, but it is the insurgents
with their car bombs have spread fear into the foreign troops and
Iraqis. It is now not what it used to be. The car bomb has been
modified with low technical skills and using common every day
appliances like doors. It has become a deady weapon, especially the
Americans and others fear death by these bombs more than anything
else.
The country is ruled from the fortified Green Zone, named by the
Americans for the area from which Saddam Hussein ruled. They do not
leave it except under heavy escort, and are more worried of evading
car bombs and ambushes than knowing the country and its problems. To
make matters worse, the Americans and the British have taken their
proteges to task, and there has been open fights. They have demanded
that the local authority does not touch them, this is resented by the
population at large, and so those officially linked with the
Americans stay put at the fortified zone. Not that this helps them.
The insurgents have make their way into the fortified zones where
they are, and created havoc. The Americans have stopped telling the
world they are winning, in fact gives out news only when it puts them
in a good light. The media once used to carry daily reports of their
success, but not anymore.
Today, only the insurgent's dastardly behavour, as they say, is
reported. Even the Arab media has toned it coverage. To make sure it
does, its media is regularly killed. It is dangerous to be from the
media if one has a different view from the West of the civil war in
Iraq. The reporters were the megaphones of the invasion. Later, they
took a more neutral stance, and now are cowed because their number is
killed, both by the Americans and the insurgents. Iraq is now more
dangerous than Vietnam ever was. But instead of understanding the
enemy, the West not only annoys it but gets the world to accept its
assessment. Osama bin Laden is kept alive, at least in the public
imagination, since he is the leader that the war on terror is hoping
to kill. But he has become the beneficiary, just as Ho Chi Minh was.
Ho Chi Minh's death robbed the Americans of an enemy in Vietnam, and
they had to leave with tails behind their legs, This will happen in
Iraq too.
In the process, the Americans have made enemies of the Middle East and
Iran. It wanted to keep Syria under control, and now set its eyes on
Iran. It is a war of words now, but these countries could interfere
in Iraq through their proxies. If they have not done so, then the
insurgency could slip into them. The Americans had planned to stay
for ever in Iraq, at least that is the Pentagon's aim. It has the
support only of the governments in the Middle East, but these
governments are more at risk now than ever before. The Middle East
remains a cauldron, largely because the youngsters cannot get jobs,
the people are pushed around. For many death is preferable. And so
many willingly die for a cause. The West cannot understand it. But it
has become a weapon in the insurgents' arsenal.
The Al Qaeda attack on the Abqaiq oil refinery in Saudi Arabia was
foiled, but that the car bombers made a point. The oil refineries in
the Middle East are exposed. American presence in Iraq for reasons
that are now found to be false, and its war on terror on the Muslims,
will see to that. In Pakistan's Baluchistan, action against the Bukti
and Murree tribes by President Musharraf had redound on Pakistan. He
is in a precarious position. The earth quake last year affected the
Pathans. The foreign aid was distributed by the Pakistan government,
which already was in enmity with the Pathans.
The Americans have rushed in like bulls in china shop, especially
after it invaded neighbouring Afghanistan. It has arrested for years
without trial Afghans and Pathans in Guantano Bay. The Americans put
a gloss over it telling how they taught English to some who have been
released. But their presence is no different than the Russians. The
Russians had their Najibullah, the Americans have their Hamid Karzai.
Both had lived overseas before they were made President, Najibullah
was torn to bits by an Afghan crowd. The Americans can just hope that
this fate would not be Hamid Karzai's. The same fate awaited the
Iraqi prime minister under British overlordship, when he was torn to
bits while trying to escape in a women's veiled dress. Would that
fate also be the American-installed Iraqi leaders?
M.G.G. Pillai
pillai@streamyx.com
| |
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
This archive was created as a tribute to the late veteran
journalist MGG Pillai. We believed his writings are useful to develop a critical
thinking analysis.
By the way, the original mggpillai.com web site (2001-2006) was actually created
by one of us.
|
|