The rise in petrol price damages the National Front
2006-03-02
THE GOVERNMENT WILL SAVE RM4.4 billion annually by raising petrol
prices but it will cost Malaysians five times that. This saving will be spent on
public transport, says Pak Lah. So we must be happy the petrol prices are up! In
1990, it was RM1.10 a litre, today it is RM1.92. This is said to be inevitable, but
is it? Its explanation why this is necessary comes after the public rebelled.
Will the Malaysian government tell us, as rumours put it, why we are
selling oil to Taiwan at about RM20 till 2010. Again as rumours,
which turn out to be true most of the time, tell it, Malaysia is
paying Taiwan US$40 a barrel for all the oil we do not sell or use.
Most of that oil is now left in the ground, but we pay nevertheless.
I was told this cannot be true: "If what you say is true, this is an
unequal contract, and will be set aside." This rumour may be false,
but before it gets wider publicity, the government must come clean
about it. But can there be an unequal contract when the sale is by a
willing buyer to a willing seller?
If general election was in the next few months, the government would
not have raised the oil price; if it did, it would have absorbed it.
There is no general election in the air, and there is enough time to
fool the people and be swept in power. But the National Front
government blinked. It announced public spending in transport of the
savings. What this means is that the RM1.4 billion the government
saves would be available every year for public transport. This is
nonsene. This claim on improving public transport is to hoodwink the
people. There is, as far as I know, no attempt at improving public
transport before the petrol hike. It this had been announced before
the petrol rise, the reaction would not be as sharp. The government
was taken aback that Dato' Seri Najib annonced this saving would be
put in improving public transport.
But a rise in petrol price affects the living costs of the people. The
salaries would not go up 18 per cent, the percentage of petrol price
rise, let alone double to meet the additional cost of everday living.
The National Front knows this. This is attempts are made after to
soften the opposition, not so that public transport can be improved.
The National Front – UMNO, MCA, MIC, Gerakan, IPF, the Sarawak and
Sabah parties, and others – have assumed they know what the people
want, that they can do what they like for the people who voted them
into office. The long suffering Malaysians has been gluttons for
punishment, will gladly vote the National Front into office election
after election. It had an irritant opposition from PAS, the only
other political party which has the wherewithal to become the
government of the day, but that day is far off. It did not therefore
bother about that. The National Front knew this psychology of the
voter only too well. Their aim is power forever, and they will tell
any tall tales to ensure that.
But there is a fly in the National Front ointment. The younger voters,
particularly the Malays, do not believe in this widely held belief
that UMNO, its lead party, is there to ensure that they will be
looked after. UMNO has turned into a religious party, which the
National Front endorsed. It fights a political battle to have its
version of Islam – called Islam Hadhari under the Pak Lah
administration – against the PAS version, which is the Islam ordained
in the Quran. This is understood by the UMNO leadership, for when
UMNO meets PAS head on – in Kelantan, Trengganu, Kedah and Perlis –
there is no mention of Islam Hadharii and only that PAS misuses the
Quiran. Malaysias only hear of PAS members joining UMNO but many UMNO
members, especially in recent years, have joined PAS. That is not
reported, for that in National Front eyes, is not important, and the
newspapers, in truth its propaganda organs, stay away from such
newsta.
UMNO leaders – the other leaders in the National Front will not talk
except to echo UMNO words, whether its members and the communities
they represent agree or not, virtually telling their people that the
leaders would do as they like. But it has to be careful now. The
ordinary Malaysian do not believe that. In the past, they had no
avenues. Now they write or say their piece on the Internet, which is
more believed than the National Front public relations rags which
appear as newspapers or relevision and radio stations. The Government
makes sure that all follow its line. It replies to Internet queries
in formal press conferences, which is reported as a secretary would
write her report. The Malaysian media, orwned by the government or
National Front members, do not report opposition to government
policy. So the reaction to the petrol rise on the Internet is
believed more than the the official media, the megaphone to
authority. The reporters, knowing which side their bread is buttered,
go along. But these reporters know what is going on. In Myanmar or
Singapore, for instance, the the reporters know what happens, and are
more accurate and believable than the diplomatic briefings. It is
beginning to be so in Malaysia.
The National Front hopes that the Malaysian public will forget the
petrol price rises. As it hopes they would of official attempts to
make women, non-Malays, non-Muslims second class citizens. The
opposition now accept that Malaysians must be canvassed against these
moves. This will still give the National Front a head start, but it
would have to fight hard to prevent that. In the heady days of
Independence and before, UMNO could do what it wanted because it was
a nationalist movement which brought independence. No political party
would get much support if it challenged a nationalist movement. But
since 1987 UMNO is a political party, and therefore defeatable. This
happened in India in the 1970s, and the first opposition was led by a
former member of Congress, Mr Morarji Desai.
UMNO and the National Front is going that path.although it might be 20
or more years later. The rise in petrol price, which it might be
inevitable, is yet another reason why the National Front and UMNO is
defensive. Add to this Pak Lah's irrelevant homilities, the belief
that his son-in-law leads Pak Lah by his nose, infighting in UMNO and
the National Front. It will be a long time before the National Front
becomes the opposition in the centre, but it will have to learn how
to explain its policies to the Malaysian people, an art it forgot as
being in government became more important than succouring those who
voted them in.
M.G.G. Pillai
pillai@streamyx.com
| |
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
This archive was created as a tribute to the late veteran
journalist MGG Pillai. We believed his writings are useful to develop a critical
thinking analysis.
By the way, the original mggpillai.com web site (2001-2006) was actually created
by one of us.
|
|