As the civil service, so the country
2006-03-08
"THE OFFICER IS ON leave" is the frequent answer to Malaysians who
turn up on an appointed date. The office should not shut down because
the officer is on leave. But the practice in Malaysia in the last 35
years is for files to be under lock and key, which the officer takes
with him on leave. This is not how the Malaysian civil service should
function. But instead of the checks and balances that exist, it is
now controlled by a Malay-Islamic group, usually at mid-level or
lower. It is incumbent on civil servants to leave their office on
transfer or promotion to make his office more Malay and Islamic. The
non-Malay in the civil service is a rarity. But his promotion is
stunted by this group, the "fairness" in the system is seen in the
promotion to the top of perhaps three non-Malays.
With the result, even the chief secretary, the highest civil servant,
look to this group before he takes a decision. But this attitude
pervades the uniformed services as well. A solitary Indian joins the
police as an inspector 33 years ago, good at his job that he was made
the Malaysian representative to an international crime preventing
organisation, retired as an assistant superintendent of police, never
having gone on a beat, or served in the police districts. He was
posted to district headquarters once, but that was because he was to
be promoted before he retired. But one of his Malay batch mates
became Inspector-General of Police, and several, all Malays, were in
the chairmed circles surrounding him. There are no senior non-Malay
police officers now who can interact with their communities.
The recent nude squat scandal, in which a Malay girl said it was she
and not a Chinese girl in the widely distributed video pictures of a
girl doing the nude squat, which dried up tourist traffic from China,
and for which a Malaysian cabinet minister apologised to the Beijing
government, should not have happened. But if you are stopped by the
police, or you go to a policeman for help, you would often be
penalised. Tourist in the Malaysian police vocabulary means the
Caucasian white, though not these days from the Caucasus. This white
tourist, even if he is a hippie, is treated better by the local
policeman, than a multimillionaire from Asia wanting to invest in
Malaysia. An Indian business man wanting to sell back to Sime Darby
its Indian unit, which he had bought earlier, was not allowed to come
to Malaysia although his plane was. He went to Singapore instead, and
told the officials to sign the agreement there instead. An Indian
immigration chief, invited by his Malaysian counterpart, went back
after he was not allowed in.
This happens despite annual meetings, usually away from office, to
improve services. Even the judiciary now meet to improve itself.
Every Wednesday after, a post-cabinet meeting discusses cabinet
decisions. This is meant for officers, particularly heads of
departments, to understand policies that the government had
formulated. Often, after the briefing, heads of department discuss
the policies at a meeting often headed by the secretary-general. In
addition, he holds a bi-weekly staff meetings so that problems in
formulating policy would be discussed. There are other meetings for
lower officials. These meetings are also to tell the head of the
chief secretary, and through him the cabinet, of problems the civil
service encounters.
While the civil service is doing all this correctly, it ignores its
role in making life easier for the public. It is helped in their work
by the modern high-tech equipment and IT gadgets. But people, whom
they are to oversee, are let down. It takes longer for the public to
get what they want. Once, the EPF took days to issue a cheque after a
request for withdawal. Today, it takes three months to process the
application. It takes the judiciary years, in some cases, to write
its judgements, more now with all the labour-saving devices at its
command. Judgements were handed down much earlier when the judiciary
did not have all these devices. The general reaction of the public is
that the judiciary is worse now than ever. And so all government
services.
Where it affects the public, it is worse. Rubbish collection is not
regular. The officer is more concerned about procedures, than dirt
being removed. The worker in the ground does not often know what he
has to do. Or prefers not to know. The non-Malay dare not open his
mouth to protest, and the Malay in charge prefer not to do what he is
to do. The system has been destroyed. A minister once said the system
is good as its results. It is no use saying that the civil service
follows the latest international standards in administration. You can
find it is not working by asking Telekoms for a telephone number you
had forgotten. You are left pressing numbers and listening the same
old spiel: "Your call is important to us", and holding the telephone
for minutes on end. This is so in many government departments, where
you hear the added message, that the officer is not in. Now, this
fever of technology has hit the private and government-linked
companies. So much so that help is asked for only if you have time to
spare and need practice in pressing numbers on the telephone. Try
calling Astro, and you will know that this "high-tech" nonsense seeps
into private companies.
Instead of the civil service advising the politicians, it is often the
other way around. The government service ignore what they should
follow, and instead curry favour with those in power. How else could
the prime minister's son-in-law, who holds no official post, ride
rough shod over them? It was he who wanted petrol prices raised, to
meet a shortfall between the projects he had proposed for the Ninth
Malaysia Plan, and what was budgeted for. The public does not know
what is being doing in their name, and they now demand an accounting.
But the civil service, with the connivance of politicians in power,
prefer to do in secret, often putting the man-in-the-steet
shortchanged.
M.G.G. Pillai
pillai@streamyx.com
| |
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
This archive was created as a tribute to the late veteran
journalist MGG Pillai. We believed his writings are useful to develop a critical
thinking analysis.
By the way, the original mggpillai.com web site (2001-2006) was actually created
by one of us.
|
|